The Roman Church and their doctrine of a "Moral Duty" to Cooperate with Evil as evidenced in their documents
The Roman Church calls taking “vaccines” tainted by innocent blood “cooperation in evil” yet at the same time declared it a moral duty to do so
As I wrote in my last post, the bishop conference of Germany (DBK) called “vaccination” against Covid-19 in unison a “moral duty” . The bishop conference of Austria had not only emphasised the “moral duty” to get vaccinated, but actually expressis verbis supported the government in implementing mandatory “vaccination”.
These slogans were not only propagandistic but also fraudulent.
As I showed in my last post there was no factual basis for their claims, as the gene products had never been authorised “for preventing transmission from one person to another” as EMA explicitly repeated recently.. According to the Apostolic Exhortation “Pastores Gregis” issued by John Paul II in 2003, “… Every Bishop … stands in the place of the Father of Jesus Christ in such a way that … he is to be revered by all.” Therefore, even supposing they had not positively known the truth, for a bishop who claims to stand in the place of Almighty God Himself to simply parrot other people’s propaganda without verifying the facts is fraudulent behaviour.
Moreover, morally pressuring people into an EXPERIMENTAL drug based on a novel technology that has record reports of side effects in the official data basis in Europe (EMA) and the States (VAERS), both passive reporting systems, is not only unethical, but evil. The findings from the - active - reporting system V-safe, particularly set up for the gene-shots, are frightening.
For V-safe, over 10 Million participants were being followed. Almost one Million people (0,8 %) reported to have required medical care after the shot.
These findings correspond with a study professor Matthes from Charité university hospital in Berlin had conducted. He likewise actively followed over 30 000 vaccinated individuals; 0,8 % of the individuals, so Matthes, had reported serious side effects. Unsurprisingly, Matthes finally had to retract the study.
Compare these findings with the data of the NZL whistleblower, indicating around 13 million Covid deaths world wide. “From this data, we can accurately estimate that overall, the mRNA vaccines led to the premature death of more than 1 person per 1,000 doses on average over all doses.”
What makes the relentless clerical propaganda and sales campaign for a pharmaceutical product even more evil is the fact that these products have the potential - actually high probability - to cause changes in the recipient’s GOD-given Code of Life (here and here).
But this is still not the whole story.
On top of all of this, all four of the products the bishops campaigned for so eagerly use cell lines of “aborted foetuses” in the production/testing process.
Fully developed babies born alive dissected without anaesthetics in order to “successfully harvest” organs for cell lines
I use quotation marks when writing “aborted foetuses” for a simple reason: If you start investigating the issue, you will soon find out that scientists do not get “usable tissue” for biomedical research from ‘abortions’ in the sense the term usually is used. Rather, fully developed human beings born alive are dissected without anaesthesia while their heart is still beating. Otherwise the organs “harvested” are worthless for medical research.
Listen for example to Dr. Theresa Deisher, a scientist with integrity willing to speak about this horror - and searching for alternatives. Her videos on Youtube have, at least mostly, been censured.
In August 2021, the Center for Medical Progress, CMP, had published the University of Pittsburgh’s horrifying admission following a FOIA request made by CMP. The FOIA request concerned Pitt’s fetal “kidney harvesting” program. In this organ “harvesting” program, Pitt intended to collect urinary and genital organs throughout the development of the foetus.
In answering CMP’s FOIA request, Pitt had to admit that the hearts of the - necessarily born alive - foetuses were still beating when the organs were being cut out of their bodies.
As CMP writes in their article: "The University states the fetal organs do not undergo ischemia—lose their blood supply—until “after the tissue collection procedure”
No matter where you stand in the debate “pro life” or “pro choice”, this is a completely different dimension.
This is not about protecting bodily autonomy and therefore human dignity of the woman. Rather, this is about exploiting and commercialising human life, a human being.
I say a human being despite the value judgment of the Bible we commonly use. Actually, according to the Masoretic text of Lev 24:17 and Exodus 21:22 ff, the foetus in the womb is not considered a human being.
I know, priests and pastors tell us differently while claiming to “stand on the Bible” in order to make them sound more authoritative. The truth is that this is their personal belief, standing at odds with the Bible we use.
According to the Septuagint Version of Exodus 21:22 ff however, a distinction has to be made between a child imperfectly or perfectly formed. A child perfectly formed is, according to the Septuagint, a human being.
Anyway, dissecting alive a completely developed child and on top of it born, i.e. outside the womb, with the heart still beating, is utter perversion and an abomination in my personal view.
Again, all Covid “vaccines” use cell lines of “aborted foetuses” - that is human beings dissected alive with their hearts still beating - in their production/testing process. (Here is a list on Dr. Deisher’s website). The Vatican in a document issued December 2020 is discussing the issue - without disclosing the truth behind the veiled and misleading expression “aborted foetuses” - coming to the following conclusion:
“… the use of these vaccines [is] morally licit” as “…the kind of cooperation in evil on the part of those making use of the resulting vaccines, [is] remote.”
First of all, I completely agree that buying and using these products is cooperation in the evil of dissecting a human being alive without anaesthetics in order to profit from his or her body parts. You cannot use a product without implicitly consenting to the way it is produced unless you have been deceived or kept in the dark about it.
Secondly, I disagree with the statement that in this case the kind of cooperation is“remote”. Every person buying such a product is giving a direct incentive and saying yes to the continuous use of these tissues obtained in a macabre and horrifying manner.
Take for example the University of Pittsburgh. In 2015 Pitt told HHS that it has been "collecting fetal tissue for over 10 years … includ[ing] liver, heart, gonads, legs, brain, genitourinary tissues including kidneys, ureters and bladders." You think this research would go on if too many people would refuse to give their money for the products developed in this way?
According to Theresa Deisher, children are exploited on a daily basis for biomedical research. What would become of the industry financing this kind of “research” if too many people said NO, THANK YOU to their products?
The Vatican does not even inform their sheep about the cell lines used and how they are obtained. Obviously, this would harm the industry - and for whatever reason … …the Vatican tries not to aggrieve them or hamstring their business.
They do decide these things for all of their sheep, but then they try not to make waves about it. In Germany, it is only doctors trying to raise awareness about the issue. Churches in Germany are silent. This was an issue long before Covid - the Roman Catholic’s thumbs-up about the use of those products as well. Nevertheless, ask a German Catholic - or well-educated Germans in general - about fetal cell lines used in pharmaceutical products (amongst others) and especially in the Covid “vaccines”; explain to them how these cell lines are obtained; they will accuse you of talking nonsense. I’ve been there.
Anyway, making a long story short:
The Bishops do not deny - according to their own documents - that taking these products is cooperation in evil. Likewise, they declared taking these products a moral duty, even mandating them in the Vatican. Therefore, they unequivocally declare “cooperation in evil” a moral duty.
Does anybody want to defile their temple of the Holy Spirit with innocent blood and listen to the strange doctrines of the Roman bishops?
“Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own?” 1 Cor 6:19
I find the "Statement of the German Bishops' Conference
on preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)" quite interesting. Here you can read:
"Human dignity belongs to every human being in the same way. It does not depend on the parents' life plan, social status, education or level of physical development".
...sounds good to me!
"For the Catholic Church, the question of whether PGD should be permitted is a matter of great importance because of the need to protect those who are not yet able to express their own will."
...that is what I would expect from our "shepards".
But how is a person of healthy mind and moral integrity to reconcile this with the proposition of cooperation in evil?
What if the shepherd becomes the executioner?
What remains is the escape into cognitive dissonance or distancing oneself from the new "Club of Rome". Or, as a third option, the guilt of complicity.
https://www.dbk.de/fileadmin/redaktion/diverse_downloads/presse/2011-044_Anl_2-PID.pdf